Sunday, October 7, 2007

What drives the stock market?(2)

Behavioral-finance theory holds that markets might fail to reflect economic fundamentals under three conditions. When all three apply, the theory predicts that pricing biases in financial markets can be both significant and persistent.

Irrational behavior.
Investors behave irrationally when they don't correctly process all the available information while forming their expectations of a company's future performance. Studies have shown that investors often put too much weightage and focus on recent events and results, regardless of the level of significance. This is an error that leads them to overprice companies with strong recent performance. Others are excessively conservative and underprice stocks of companies that have released positive news. Similarly, stock prices of companies tend to get oversold after 1 or 2 quarters of weak financial earnings.

Systematic patterns of behavior.
Even if individual investors decided to buy or sell without consulting economic fundamentals, the impact on share prices would still be limited. Only when their irrational behavior is also systematic (that is, when large groups of investors share particular patterns of behavior) should persistent price deviations occur. Hence behavioral-finance theory argues that patterns of overconfidence, overreaction, and overrepresentation are common to many investors and that such groups can be large enough to prevent a company's share price from reflecting underlying economic fundamentals—at least for some stocks, some of the time.

Limits to arbitrage in financial markets.
When investors assume that a company's recent strong performance alone is an indication of future performance, they may start bidding for shares and drive up the price. Some investors might expect a company that surprises the market in one quarter to go on exceeding expectations. As long as enough other investors notice this myopic overpricing and respond by taking short positions, the share price will fall in line with its underlying indicators.
However, this sort of arbitrage doesn't always occur. In practice, the costs, complexity, and risks involved in setting up a short position can be too high for individual investors, especially in singapore market, where the terms and conditions do not favour the short-sellers.

6 comments:

Musicwhiz said...

Hi there,

Your blog is insightful and I like your article onj behavioural finance as I am also reading up on it myself.

I am a value investor and I maintain a blog at http://sgmusicwhiz.blogspot.com

If you don't mind, maybe we can exchange blog links ?

Thanks, musicwhiz

level13 said...

Hi musicwhiz,
Thanks for your comments. Of course i dont mind exchanging blog links.

I am aware of your frequent contributions in the various online forums as i surf those websites quite often too.

CHEERS!

Musicwhiz said...

Thanks level13 !

Have added your blog link to my list too. Do come visit often and feel free to comment on any posting (I will be notified thru email). I will visit your blog periodically as well.

Have a great week !

Regards, musicwhiz

Berkshire said...

Hi,

I've added your blog on my site. Nice to have another value investor in the list.

Cheers

Anonymous said...

Hi there Level 13,

I read your post on Contel and absolutely agree with you views. This brings my attention to another counter, Kedacom.

This company is currently selling such trailing PE ratio at around 4. However, it is producing a strong cash flow. Furthermore it's prospects seem very rosy indeed.

What's your take on the reason for such an apparantly low valuation of Kedacom? Personally, i think it is probably very neglected and investors are refusing to buying due to fear of having their funds stuck in an illquid stock. This some what forms a vicious cycle of some sort.

Thanks

level13 said...

Hi anonymous,
My comments are limited as I only took a quick glance at the latest annual report for Kedacom.
Below are some of the things i have noticed.
1) the financial report is for 15 mths not 12 mths. so before u calculate any financial ratios, u need to estimate the 12 mths earnings.
2) it is not entirely accurate to say that they have strong cash flow. I noted that there is an advance customer payment of abt 18 mil which i believe is not recurring in nature. if we remove this one-off event, then there will not be much cashflow from operations to speak of.

In short, one has to be aware not to fall into the value trap. Just because it has a low P/E does not necessary make it a good investment. More research and investigations need to be done.

CHEERS!